← Did You Know?
πŸ”­Space7 min read

Vera Rubin & Dark Matter

In the 1970s, Vera Rubin pointed a telescope at spinning galaxies and found something that should have been impossible. The universe turned out to be mostly made of something we still cannot see, touch, or explain.

In plain English

Imagine watching a merry-go-round. The children near the edge should fly off if it spins too fast, the physics is simple. The people near the centre have a tight hold on the central pole; the people at the edge have nothing to hold them.

Now imagine the merry-go-round spins at a speed that should send the outer children flying, and they don't move. They stay on, perfectly, as if something invisible is holding them.

That is what Vera Rubin found when she pointed her telescope at the Andromeda galaxy in the 1960s and 70s.

Galaxies rotate. The stars near the edges should orbit more slowly than the stars near the centre, because the gravity pulling them inward weakens with distance. This is exactly how planets behave in our solar system: Mercury is fast, Neptune is slow. It is what Newton's laws predict.

But the stars at the edges of galaxies were not slowing down. They were moving just as fast as the stars near the centre, sometimes faster. By the physics everyone understood, they should have been flung out into intergalactic space.

The only explanation that held up was uncomfortable: there is far more mass in these galaxies than the visible stars account for. Mass that does not shine. Mass that does not absorb light. Mass that is, in every way we can currently detect, invisible.

We now call it dark matter. We have never directly detected it. We have no idea what it is. And it makes up approximately 27 percent of everything in the universe.

Five things to file under "wait, what?"

  • Dark matter outweighs ordinary matter by more than five to one. Everything you can see, every star, planet, dust cloud, and gas nebula, is only about 5 percent of the universe's total mass-energy content. Dark matter is 27 percent. The rest (68 percent) is dark energy, which is even more mysterious.

  • Vera Rubin was told her discovery was probably an error. Astronomers met her early measurements of galaxy rotation with scepticism, assuming there must be a mistake in the data. She returned with better equipment and better measurements and showed the discrepancy was real. Then she measured it in more galaxies. And more. It was always real.

  • The term "dark matter" was not coined by Rubin. Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky used it in 1933 to describe missing mass he had calculated in galaxy clusters. But the field largely ignored his work for decades. Rubin's systematic measurements established the phenomenon beyond serious doubt.

  • Rubin was the second woman permitted to use the Palomar Observatory. She used the 200-inch Hale Telescope, one of the most powerful on Earth at the time, to make her key measurements. She was not granted access easily.

  • She never received the Nobel Prize. The physics Nobel Prize has never gone to the discovery of dark matter, despite it being one of the most significant cosmological findings of the twentieth century. Rubin died in December 2016. Nobel Prizes are not awarded posthumously.

The full story

Who was Vera Rubin?

Vera Florence Cooper was born in Philadelphia in 1928. By the time she was ten, she was fascinated by the movement of stars outside her bedroom window. She built her own telescope at fourteen. When she applied to Vassar College, her acceptance letter noted her interest in astronomy; the admissions department wrote back suggesting she consider something more practical, like painting.

She ignored the advice and attended Vassar on a scholarship. When she applied to Princeton for graduate school, she received a brochure explaining that women were not admitted to the astronomy programme. She went to Cornell and then Georgetown instead. She completed her PhD in 1954. Her thesis argued that galaxies were not distributed randomly across the universe but were clustered, a conclusion rejected by most astronomers at the time and confirmed twenty years later.

She spent most of her career at the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism at the Carnegie Institution in Washington, DC. She was not an outsider to the field: she was a methodical, rigorous scientist working at one of the world's finest research institutions. Her isolation came from the fact that, for many years, the field did not take her work seriously.

The galaxy rotation curves

From the late 1960s onwards, Rubin worked with physicist Kent Ford on a spectrograph that could measure the velocities of stars at the edges of galaxies with unprecedented accuracy. Their instrument split the light from individual stars into spectra; the Doppler shift of those spectra revealed how fast the stars were moving toward or away from Earth.

The prediction, based on Newtonian gravity and the known distribution of visible stars, was clear: stars further from the galactic centre should move more slowly. This is called a Keplerian velocity profile, named for Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion.

What Rubin and Ford measured was flat rotation curves. The stars at the edges of Andromeda moved at roughly the same speed as the stars near the centre. They measured the same thing in dozens of other galaxies. The pattern was universal.

The mathematics of the situation required that there be far more mass present than the visible stars could account for, and that this mass had to extend far beyond the visible disc of the galaxy, in an enormous spherical halo.

What dark matter might be

In the decades since Rubin's measurements, physicists have proposed numerous candidates for dark matter. None has been confirmed.

WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles): Hypothetical particles that interact with gravity and the weak nuclear force but not with electromagnetism (hence, invisible). Large underground detectors have searched for WIMPs directly for thirty years. The searches have grown highly sensitive. Nothing has been found.

Axions: Extremely light hypothetical particles, originally proposed to solve a problem in quantum chromodynamics unrelated to dark matter. They are now considered serious dark matter candidates. Experiments are under way.

Primordial black holes: Black holes formed in the early universe, before any stars existed. They would be gravitationally detectable but light-invisible. Current evidence limits what fraction of dark matter this could account for.

Something entirely unknown: The most honest answer. The particle physics Standard Model, which describes all known particles, contains nothing that behaves like dark matter. Whatever it is, it is outside the current theoretical framework.

Rubin herself was characteristically direct about this. She wrote: "We become increasingly convinced that the universe is more complex than we imagined. Dark matter is not simply missing β€” it is something new."

Her legacy

Rubin's rotation curves convinced the scientific community that dark matter was real. Her work transformed cosmology. The standard model of cosmology, the Ξ›CDM model, treats dark matter as a foundational component of the universe's structure. Every major structure formation simulation, every gravitational lensing analysis, and every cosmic microwave background measurement depends on its existence.

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Chile, built specifically to survey the night sky at a scale and depth never before attempted, bears her name. It is expected to produce the most complete map of dark matter structure in the universe ever assembled.

She did not live to see it completed. But the question she surfaced, what is the universe mostly made of, is one of the central open problems in all of science.

Go deeper

For the curious:

On YouTube:

Keep going

More things worth knowing

All topics β†’